Scientific
articles follow a general pattern. A fairly simple pattern is followed by the
vast majority of papers published in scientific journals today. Most papers
follow the “IMRAD” format with some variations. IMRAD pattern contains:
Introduction
Method (experiment, theory,
design, model)
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
In
addition to this main structure, scientific articles will also have the
components like Title, Author details,
Abstract, Key words, Acknowledgements, References
and Footnotes.
All
articles begin with a title. In most papers, title is followed by an abstract
and ‘key words’. All three of these components describe an article’s content in
varying degrees of detail. The purpose of the title is to stimulate the reader’s
interest. The abstract summarises the content of the paper. The half-dozen or
so key words, also called ‘descriptors’, together with the title and the abstract,
facilitate computer-based search and retrieval.
1.
Title
A
title will be read by thousands of people and only a few will be reading the
entire article. Hence, a good title is required to attract and inform the
readers about the content. The title should be accurate and needs to stand out
in some way from the other thousands of titles that compete for the reader’s attention.
It should also tell the reader what the paper is about. All words in the title
should be chosen with great care and they should have association with one
another. Titles should not be too long or too short. Titles should not contain
abbreviations, chemical formula, proprietary names rather than generic names,
jargon etc. Some key words should be included in the title relating to the
topic of the paper to facilitate computer-based searches. Also, Indexing and
abstracting services are heavily dependent on the accuracy of the title and an
improper title may miss the reach of intended audience.
2.
Author
Details
List
of authors usually follow the title of a scientific article. List of authors
should include those who have actively contributed to the overall design and
execution of the particular research work. No authorship issue in the case of
single author papers. Two author articles require clarification regarding who
comes first. Problem becomes more complicated as the number of authors
increase.
· The sequence of names of the authors to
an article must reflect the relative scientific or professional contribution of
the authors, irrespective of their academic status.
· The general rule is that the name of the
principal contributor should come first, with subsequent names in order of
decreasing contribution.
·
Mere possession of an institutional
position on its own, such as Head of the Research team, does not justify
authorship.
·
A student should be listed as a
principal author on any multi-authored article that is substantially based on
the student’s dissertation or thesis.
Sometimes,
more than 10 authors will be there for a single paper. Such papers will be
quoted in references with the name of first author, followed by et al. Eg: Stephen et
al. Degrees (MD, MS, Ph D etc) or titles (Dr, Mr/Mrs) are not usually added
in author details except some medical journals. However, author should go
through the “author instructions” provided by the journal before preparing
scientific paper to that particular journal. “Author instruction” or “Instruction
for authors” of a journal clearly defines the pattern and style to be followed
while preparing an article to that specific journal.
Author
name is followed by institutional address of authors where the research work
was carried out. If the author has moved to a new institute at the time of publication,
then that address is also added as “present address”. Also communication
details like e mail address of a “corresponding author” will be added. The “corresponding author” is the one
individual who takes primary responsibility for communication with the journal
during the manuscript submission, peer review, and publication process.
3. Abstract
Abstract
of an article is placed at the top of the paper immediately after title and
authors. However, it is written last by the author as the abstract should summarise
the work in limited words. A well prepared abstract enables the reader to
identify the basic content of the paper quickly and accurately and thus the
author can decide whether they need to read the document entirely. It is considered as the mini version of the
paper and is defined as the summary of the information in the document. It
should not exceed 250 words, should clearly define what is dealt with in the
paper and should be written in past tense.
Abstracts
generally follow the same pattern, summarising the objective and scope of the
study, methodology, results and principal conclusions of the study in a very
clear and compact manner. Such abstracts are called “informative abstract”.
“Structured
abstracts’ are another type now common in medical and many social science
articles. Structured abstracts have typically 5 sud-headings, back ground, aim/
objective, method, result & conclusion. Compared to traditional informative abstracts,
structured abstracts contain more information, easier to search, easier to
read, facilitated peer review for conferences and also more welcomed by readers
and authors.
References:
1.
James Hartely, 2008. Academic writing
and publishing-A practical handbook (ISBN 0-203-92798-2), Routledge Taylor
& Francis Group, New York
2.
Robert A Day and Barbara Gastel, 2012. How
to write and publish a scientific paper (ISBN 978-1-107-67074-7), Cambridge
University press, UK.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.